Sunday, August 16, 2009

Eliyahu's Locker Room

Subscribe to the Daily Daf Yomi Summary here.

The Gemora (Sukkah 5a) states that the presence of Hashem (as manifested in the higher worlds) never descended to within ten tefachim of the physical world. Similarly, Moshe and Eliyahu could not ascend to within ten tefachim of the upper worlds.

Discussing that Gemora, the Chasam Sofer explains that this was only as long as Eliyahu was encumbered by his physical body. However, once his soul was freed from its body, he assumed the status of an angel, and was not bound by any of these limitations.

The Chasam Sofer proceeds to say that when Mashiach comes, Eliyahu will once again don his body and live as a human amongst the other great people of that great generation. He will be allowed to rule on any halachic issues (a privilege reserved for mankind) since at that time he will have reassumed the existence of a human being. Meanwhile, however, he has the status of an angel, and therefore he is not bound by any of the limitations imposed upon men. This applies for halachah as well; Eliyahu may traverse the globe on Shabbos to go to a bris milah, even though this involves traveling beyond the permitted distance, since as an angel he is not bound by halachah.

Our Gemora relates an incident where Rabbah bar Avuha encountered Eliyahu in a graveyard. Rabbah asked him how he was permitted to be there despite his being a Kohen. The Chasam Sofer explains that Eliyahu must have been in his body at the time, because otherwise, he would have the status of an angel, and Rabbah would have known that as such, these halachos do not apply to him.

2 comments:

joshwaxman said...

"This applies for halachah as well; Eliyahu may traverse the globe on Shabbos to go to a bris milah, even though this involves traveling beyond the permitted distance, since as an angel he is not bound by halachah."

this is an astonishing statement. i thought of the graveyard incident, but there would seem to be a greater problem, which would appear to directly contradict this assertion. The gemara in Eruvin 43a (which I discuss here) deduces something particular to this very question -- that if Eliyahu Hanavi were traveling on Shabbos, he would travel higher than 10 tefachim off the ground, and this would allow him to take care of techum shabbos. (the same would work for a jewish superman.) thus:

"These seven rulings were said on the morning of Shabbat before Rav Chisda in the city of Sura and were repeated in the afternoon of Shabbat before Rava in Pumpedisa. Who said them? Was it not Eliyahu {who could travel this distance in so short a time, which was more than the techum, and was flying and thus travelling over 10 tefachim from the ground}? Therefore derive that there are no techumin over 10 tefachim! No! Perhaps it was Yosef the demon who said it."

if we can say as the chasam sofer said about eliyahu hanavi, why not stick with eliyahu hanavi. why resort to yosef the shed?

in the aforementioned post, i use this to show that chazal did not believe that eliyahu visits every seder. in terms of bris milah, it seems quite possible that chazal did not maintain this either. for otherwise, the gemara would have used this as a proof, since there are at least once two children far off who have their bris on shabbos. indeed, the idea of eliyahu at a bris first surfaces in the zohar.

kt,
josh

Avromi said...

I am away from Gemora and seforim, but perhaps it could not have been Eliyahu, for if he was going from place to place, he must have been w/o his "guf," and the saying of the halachos can only have been if he was "dressed" with his "guf."