tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30932360.post115448547179436422..comments2023-10-31T08:48:55.890-04:00Comments on Daf Yomi DafYomi Daf-Yomi: Daf Yomi - Yoma 57 - Peroches in RomeAvromihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13593992238707872967noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30932360.post-1154526163962475232006-08-02T09:42:00.000-04:002006-08-02T09:42:00.000-04:00Tosfos brought the proof that it was from the firs...Tosfos brought the proof that it was from the first B"H for otherwise there was no par heelam davar.<BR/>However, your point is valid that when it was returned, it probably wasn't used because it was the wrong sizeAvromihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13593992238707872967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30932360.post-1154499305611276012006-08-02T02:15:00.000-04:002006-08-02T02:15:00.000-04:00if koresh returned it and then Rome took it again,...if koresh returned it and then Rome took it again, why does he say it was from the first beis hamikdash? It could have been from the second just as well. What indicated that it was from the first? It could even have been from both? <BR/>Maybe the size? The paroches in the first would have been smaller because it was only in the space in front of the aron kidesh between two walls, while in the second it was the whole width of the heichal (because there was no wall)..Rafi G.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00699851287106903971noreply@blogger.com